Skip to content
Hammersmith and Fulham Counts — Hammersmith and Fulham, in numbers.Local help →
Hammersmith and Fulham Counts / Shepherd's Bush Green

Shepherd's Bush Green · Hammersmith and Fulham

Shepherd's Bush Green: your neighbourhood

Shepherd's Bush Green electoral ward · May 2026 boundaries. Every figure carries its own date.

What stands out here?

Homes rented from a council or housing association: 46% here, compared with 30% across Hammersmith and Fulham (16.3 percentage points higher).

The share of social housing describes the homes already here. It does not show the current waiting list or whether enough suitable homes are available.

21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.

Why this comparison is valid

The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.

Source →
A proposed response →

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages: 27.1% here, compared with 17.5% across Hammersmith and Fulham (9.5 percentage points higher).

These households met at least two census conditions covering education, employment, health and housing. This is not an income or poverty measure.

21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.

Why this comparison is valid

The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.

Source →
A proposed response →

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent: 49.5% here, compared with 57.6% across Hammersmith and Fulham (8.1 percentage points lower).

Qualifications show local skills, not whether people have secure jobs or use those skills at work.

21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.

Why this comparison is valid

The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.

Source →
A proposed response →

The ward in numbers

People aged 65 or over

9%

21 March 2021 · Shepherd's Bush Green

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All usual residents

500 out of 5,570.

Source and method →

People reporting bad or very bad health

6.1%

21 March 2021 · Shepherd's Bush Green

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All usual residents; self-reported, not age-standardised

338 out of 5,570.

Source and method →

People counted in the census

5,570

21 March 2021 · Shepherd's Bush Green

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All usual residents

5,570 out of 5,570.

Source and method →

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent

49.5%

21 March 2021 · Shepherd's Bush Green

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

Residents aged 16 and over

2,299 out of 4,648.

Source and method →

Households facing at least one measured disadvantage

62.6%

21 March 2021 · Shepherd's Bush Green

The census checks education, employment, health and housing. This is not a measure of income or poverty.

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All households

1,643 out of 2,624.

Source and method →

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages

27.1%

21 March 2021 · Shepherd's Bush Green

The census checks education, employment, health and housing. This is not a measure of income or poverty.

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All households

710 out of 2,624.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ outside the labour market

33.7%

21 March 2021 · Shepherd's Bush Green

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

1,563 out of 4,637.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ in work

59.6%

21 March 2021 · Shepherd's Bush Green

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

2,764 out of 4,637.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ not working because of long-term illness or disability

6.1%

21 March 2021 · Shepherd's Bush Green

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

285 out of 4,637.

Source and method →

People aged 16+ with no qualifications

15.4%

21 March 2021 · Shepherd's Bush Green

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

Residents aged 16 and over

715 out of 4,648.

Source and method →

Homes rented privately

34%

21 March 2021 · Shepherd's Bush Green

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All households

903 out of 2,625.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ retired

8.9%

21 March 2021 · Shepherd's Bush Green

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

415 out of 4,637.

Source and method →

Homes rented from a council or housing association

46%

21 March 2021 · Shepherd's Bush Green

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All households

1,211 out of 2,625.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ unemployed

6.7%

21 March 2021 · Shepherd's Bush Green

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly. Unemployed residents as a share of all residents aged 16+; this is not the unemployment rate among economically active people.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

310 out of 4,637.

Source and method →

Crime and safety

Police-recorded locations for Shepherd's Bush Green ward. Locations are approximate; these are not all crimes or a measure of personal risk.

2,764 mapped crimes

September 2025 to August 2026. Compared with 3,196 in the previous 12 months. Anti-social behaviour is counted separately.

Mapped crime over time

September 2024 to August 2026

Shepherd's Bush Green ward · mapped crimes

Reviewed figures: September 2024 to August 2026. This reviewed record covers fewer than 30 years, so the chart opens on all of it.

Shown on this chart: 241 mapped crimes in September 2024; 282 mapped crimes in August 2026. These are recorded counts; check the coverage notes before comparing periods.

The line joins consecutive published observations.

Monthly crime and anti-social behaviour
Recorded locations by month · Shepherd's Bush Green
MonthMapped crimeAnti-social behaviour
September 202424172
October 202428252
November 202433944
December 202428935
January 202528943
February 202523044
March 202525852
April 202525357
May 202524347
June 202521156
July 202527271
August 202528961
September 202523852
October 202524456
November 202521764
December 202526336
January 202620048
February 202619554
March 202618645
April 202623555
May 202624664
June 202621065
July 202624854
August 202628247
Crime categories in the latest complete year
September 2025 to August 2026 · Shepherd's Bush Green
CategoryMapped crimes
shoplifting771
violent crime688
other theft304
theft from the person197
public order190
drugs171
vehicle crime107
robbery97
bicycle theft62
burglary62
criminal damage arson60
other crime31
possession of weapons24
What these numbers include

Approximate published locations, not every crime or personal risk.

Anti-social behaviour is separate. Transport police and unusable locations excluded.

An empty ward count means no mapped rows in the complete required force files; it does not prove that no crime occurred.

These are retrieved mapped records, not a guarantee of complete crime reporting. Approximate locations and unmapped incidents limit comparisons.

Missing ward-months invalidate totals and changes. Busy centres attract visitors, so residential population is not a measure of the number of people exposed.

Police data and method →

What could improve local safety →

Projects and proposed responses

A nearby project is not proof of a benefit to the whole ward. Only source-supported ward links are attached here.

No project boundary has been verified against this ward. See projects and their stated locations →

Proposed responses across Hammersmith and Fulham →